Latina Lista: News from the Latinx perspective > Columns & Features > Guest Voz > Guest Voz: AT&T and T-Mobile merger — a bad call for Latinos, blacks and low-income

Guest Voz: AT&T and T-Mobile merger — a bad call for Latinos, blacks and low-income

LatinaLista — The only time people give a second thought to their mobile phone service is when they don’t have service. Well, according to the Center for Media Justice, if the merger of T-Mobile and AT&T is approved a lot more people will give more than a second thought to their phone service, especially if they can no longer afford it.


From the fact-gathering done by the Center for Media Justice, the people most negatively impacted by the merger are Latinos, blacks and low-income. At a time when it’s more important than ever for people to have ready access to information, this merger endangers that access to those who can least afford to lose, what for many, has become a lifeline.

In the following, the Center for Media Justice outlines the facts about the merger, its consequences and impact.

If the purchase of T-Mobile by AT&T is approved by federal regulators, it will be a disaster for all mobile phone users — especially for people of color and low-income communities in rural and urban areas, who depend upon mobile phones for their primary access to communication and often as their only gateway to the Internet.

The takeover will inevitably lead to fewer choices and higher prices for mobile service, and a loss of as many as 20,000 jobs for T-Mobile employees, many of whom come from communities of color.


If the merger goes through, just two companies, AT&T and Verizon, will control nearly 80 percent of the mobile market in this country. The loss of a low-cost wireless carrier like T-Mobile will negatively impact communities of color.

With unemployment still around 9 percent and millions of people underemployed, it’s more important than ever that we protect as many jobs as possible.

Reality: Unemployment remains stubbornly high, standing at 9.1 percent in July 2011. During this same period, the unemployment rate was 11.3 percent for Latinos and 15.9 percent for blacks.

Merger Concerns:

In 2009, T-Mobile ranked among the “100 Best Companies to Work For” according Fortune magazine. In that survey, T-Mobile was in the top 10 companies when it came to workforce diversity, reporting that 48 percent of its 39,000 workers at that time were “minorities [sic].”

If the merger goes through, as many as 20,000 of those T-Mobile workers could lose their jobs.


T-Mobile plans are more affordable than comparable plans of other carriers. Cost is a major barrier to accessing services.

Reality: The poverty rate reached a 15-year high in 2009, with 13.4 percent of the population living in poverty (below $22,050 per year for a family of four). This rate is even higher in communities of color, with 21.9 percent of Latinos and 25.1 percent of blacks living below the poverty line.

Merger Concerns:

Between 2001 and 2007, the amount consumers spent on telephone service increased each year. In just six years, the average amount consumers spent on these services went up by nearly $200.5

T-Mobile plans cost $15 to $50 less per month than comparable plans from AT&T. If the merger goes through, new subscribers will no longer have T-Mobile as a lower-cost option–which would both restrict access and allow AT&T and all other providers to raise rates more easily.

Even current T-Mobile subscribers who migrate to AT&T plans should expect a significant price increase. While AT&T has suggested that T-Mobile customers can keep their current rates as long as they stick with “comparable” devices, AT&T has not explained just how this supposed commitment will work — especially if current T-Mobile

customers want to or are forced to upgrade their phones.

That means roughly 15.9 million people of color who are T-Mobile customers can expect to see a price increase for their mobile phone service if this merger is approved.


A horizontal merger — between AT&T, the second-largest mobile phone service provider in the U.S. and T-Mobile, the fourth-largest — would create a consolidated mobile phone market, with little to no meaningful competition.

Reality: There is already a lack of competition in the wireless market, and consumer choice is limited by lengthy service contracts and high early-termination fees that make it difficult to switch to a new service provider.

Merger Concerns:

If the merger is approved, mobile phone users who want nationwide service or a good phone will be forced to select from one of only three providers: AT&T, Verizon, or Sprint.

Even worse, AT&T and Verizon will control nearly 80% of the market. Neither Sprint nor other small carriers will be able to compete with AT&T or Verizon.


The world is changing and, increasingly, access to the Internet determines who stands to benefit from the new economy, and who is left behind.

Nowhere in the U.S. is the shift to Internet access through mobile phones making

as much of an impact as in black, Latino, and low-income households — where mobile phones are often the primary tool used to get online.

Reality: 46 percent of blacks and 51 percent of Latinos access the Internet via mobile phones, versus 38 percent of the general population.

Merger Concerns:

For many people of color, a mobile phone is the only point of access to the web, with 18 percent of blacks and 16 percent of English-speaking Latinos being cell-only Internet users, compared with 10 percent of whites.

Nearly 50 percent of T-Mobile’s customers are people of color, which is higher than every other wireless carrier.

This merger would lead to increased prices, reduced choice, and reduced innovation, all of which would depress adoption rates among communities of color.

People of color are among the fastest-growing constituencies in the United States and the most active users of mobile devices as a primary tool for activism, community engagement, and democratic participation.

Mobile devices are being used for online organizing, text-based migrant rights campaigns, voter registration, and more.

Reality: Without accessible mobile communications services, communities of color will lose this crucial venue for civic participation. Yet the free flow of ideas, creativity, information, and entrepreneurship is essential to our democracy.

Merger Concerns:

AT&T opposes any mobile Network Neutrality requirements, and it has a history of denying its customers access to the applications that they want. For example, AT&T has blocked Google Voice, Skype, and Slingbox applications in the past.

Related posts

Leave a comment